Spear-hunting bill likely dead, number of bills following suit
Hunters won’t be able to chuck spears
at game after all. A bill that would have legalized hunting with a
spear is likely dead in this legislative session, along with a host
of other interesting, if not downright controversial bills.
Senate Bill 112, sponsored by Sanders
County Republican Greg Hinkle would have made a spear a legal means
of taking game.
The bill passed the Senate on a 27-21
vote, with help from Flathead Republicans, but earlier this month
it was tabled in the House Fish and Game Committee.
A bill that gets tabled usually dies,
or is revised significantly before its brought back to life.
Several other fish and game bills are
dead or have been tabled as well, including:
• House Bill 174 would have repealed
restrictions on the use of “silencers” on firearms while hunting.
Proponents claimed the bill would have reduced hearing loss.
Opponents said it would make poaching easier. The bill, sponsored
by Republican Krayton Kearns of Laurel, was tabled in the Senate
judiciary committee.
• A bill to nullify the Endangered
Species Act, also introduced by Kearns, was recently tabled in the
House Appropriations committee. The bill gained popular support by
lawmakers after the gray wolf was put back on the Endangered
Species List. But passage of the law also would have resulted in
forfeiture of nearly $1 billion in federal funding, the bulk of
which goes toward road construction and maintenance.
Federal law ties highway funding with
state compliance of the Endangered Species Act.
• A bill that would have put a
moratorium on land purchases by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks
was tabled by the House Fish, Wildlife and Parks Committee. Senate
Bill 301 would have put a moratorium on FWP land purchases over 100
acres or $100,000 until 2013. Sponsored by Sen. Rick Ripley, of
Wolf Creek, it passed the Senate on a 29-21 vote.
There are many fish and game bills that
are still alive. For example:
• Senate Bill 402, introduced by
Bozeman Republican Joe Balyeat, would allow for a spring hunt of
wolves. A spring hunt presumably would further reduce wolf
populations in the state, as that’s when wolves are rearing pups.
The wolf hunt would allow be allowed if the state has met its
minimum number of breeding pairs and it does not allow for hunting
of females.
Unlike bears, which are usually
accompanied by cubs in the spring, female wolves will often hunt
alone. Discerning sex is difficult.
The hunt would also only be allowed if
there was not a wolf hunt the previous fall. In other words, if
wolves are delisted soon, there could be a wolf hunt this spring.
The federal government and environmental groups recently struck a
deal to delist wolves, but it still requires court approval.
• Senate Bill 157 would establish a $1
voluntary fee on a deer, antelope, elk, or wild buffalo license for
a “hunters against hunger” program. This program would allow
hunters to donate wild game to food banks. The funding would go
toward implementing the program and costs associated with properly
processing the meat.
• House Bill 621 would strengthen
aquatic invasive species laws. Sponsored by Helena Republican Duane
Ankney, it would allow for funding to control non-native aquatic
weeds.