City mulls Flower Creek Dam options
The City of Libby has taken the first
step towards finding a solution for Flower Creek Dam.
Thursday the City Council directed its
engineer Morrison-Maierle to begin a cost analysis of the survey
work that would be needed if the dam is replaced.
“If we lose that dam we would not have
any water storage,” mayor Doug Roll said. “The public safety is
paramount.”
The Council met with Morrison-Maierle
representatives during a special meeting to look at the available
options for the dam.
Engineers presented a number of
alternatives including rehabilitating the dam, replacing the dam
and finding a new water source for the city.
Rehabilitating the dam calls for
anchoring a new concrete veneer to the downstream face of the dam.
However, that fix is only expected to last about 25 years and then
the city would have to replace the dam. Morrison-Maierle is
discouraging this alternative because it would likely cost about
$1.9 million for the rehab and another $4 to $5 million to replace
the dam.
When it comes to replacing the dam on
Flower Creek, the city has two options. It could build a thin arch
structure for roughly $4.4 million or construct a roller-compacted
concrete dam, similar to Libby Dam, for about $5.6 million. Both
types of dams will last about 75 to 100 years before needing
maintenance.
Which type of dam is best would
ultimately be determined after studying the canyon walls. The
ultimate location of the dam would also have to be decided.
“Ideally we would find a site down
stream and demo the old dam,” said Ryan Jones with
Morrison-Maierle.
Replacing the dam would mean the city
will have to remove the current dam and perform environmental
restoration of the area. Further survey of the site is needed to
determine that cost.
Morrison-Maierle also looked at the
possibility of using other areas for water sources. Several options
were quickly ruled out. The water aquifer in the city is
contaminated. Pulling water from another creek, such as Parmenter
or Big Cherry, would require storage to meet the water needs of the
city essentially forcing the construction of a dam. Enough storage
tanks to serve the city would cost about $15 million.
The most viable alternative water
source is the Kootenai River. That option would use a water intake
and pump station at the river and piping water to the city’s water
treatment plant.
However, this option is cost
prohibitive with an estimated cost of $7.5 million. This option
comes with a number of expenses including the cost to modify the
water treatment plant to treat the river water, the cost to build
water lines to the treatment plant and the cost of electricity to
run the pump, which is estimated at a minimum of $200,000 per
year.
Inspections and core sample testing of
the dam have revealed that the dam is in need of replacement. Much
of the dam has considerable cracking and permeability along the
construction joints. The Montana Department of Natural Resources
and Conservation will not likely renew the city’s operating permit
in 2015 if a solution is not found. Flower Creek Dam is the city’s
sole water source.
The City Council Thursday seemed to
favor replacing the dam.
Councilmember Robin Benson said she
didn’t want to spend money on a dam that is leaking.
“I think the city needs to take care of
it now,” she said.
Mayor Doug Roll reiterated his feeling
that the city needs to protect its citizens from harm.
“The unknown risks are too great on
this,” he said. “We’re not going to sit here and say it might fall
down and it might not.”
Water needs
Flower Creek Dam is the city’s sole
source for drinking water.
The dam stores about 220-acre feet of
water. The city only needs of minimum of 50-acre feet to serve its
customers.
“There’s more than adequate storage,”
Jones said. “It far exceeds what the city needs for the next 20
years.”
Based on population figures, Lincoln
County is expected to grow at a rate of about .50 percent per year
over the 20 years. The water system usage should grow at a similar
rate.
Flower Creek should provide an adequate
source of water for the city through 2030.
Safety concerns
A number of issues have been raised
with the safety of Flower Creek Dam until a solution can be found.
One estimate is that if the dam does collapse water would move
through the canyon at a depth of up to 13 feet. It would most
likely flood the city center in up to 5 feet of water.
Local emergency response agencies have
been meeting to better prepare for the possibility that the dam
could collapse since the first test results were released.
Jones said one alternative is to lower
the water level of the reservoir to below 50 acre-feet safety
threshold. This would allow the city time to continue to operate
the dam. This would likely result in water use restrictions.
“It’s not a long term solution,” but it
would give the city some time to find a solution, Jones said.
The city is also working to install an
early warning system on the dam, which would alert officials if the
dam fails.
Funding
The city has petitioned the Governor’s
office for funding and has asked Montana’s Congressional delegation
for assistance.
A request has been made to the Governor
for $100,000 to install the early warning system on the dam.
Funding assistance could come from
Flathead Electric Co-op. FEC has been looking for green power
sources to invest in. The city could install a hydroelectric power
generation system at the new dam and sell the electricity to
FEC.
Jones recommended the city continue to
seek out funding sources even before work begins on the
project.
“You know you’re going to have to
secure funding over the next four years,” he said. “I can’t imagine
a scenario where you’re going to find 100 percent funding for your
project.”
Timeline
The city does not have a lot of time to
decide on a solution. Implementation of the project will require
coordination between the city, engineering and financial
consultants, the DNRC and other funding agencies.
Morrison-Maierle recommends the city
begin field investigation of the dam site this May. Design work
would begin in October and would likely continue through October
2012.
This puts the city on track for bidding
the project in January 2013 with construction completed in October
2013.