Grizzly bear research could be on horizon
Members of the Interagency Grizzly Bear
Committee – made up of state, federal and tribal agencies
responsible for bear management – ran a pool in 2003 to guess the
number of grizzlies in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem,
an area that includes Glacier National Park and the Bob Marshall
Wilderness.
“Everybody put $20 in an envelope and
it got put in a safety deposit box until I came out with my
estimate,” research biologist Katherine Kendall explained at a
presentation in Libby last Wednesday. “Every single one of them
were low – lower than the estimate.”
Kendall, research biologist for the
U.S. Geological Survey’s Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center,
described the methods her team used and the painstaking measures
the group took to ensure accuracy in determining the 2004 grizzly
population in the 9,600 square-mile recovery zone.
The Lincoln County commissioners hosted
Kendall’s visit to speak on the subject since the county Resource
Advisory Committee has agreed to move forward in supporting a
comparable study in the Cabinet-Yaak grizzly bear recovery
zone.
Using ballpark figures, Kendall figured
it would take about $1.15 million, 38 field crew members and three
years to replicate a DNA grizzly bear population study in the 2,600
square-mile Cabinet-Yaak recovery zone.
The NCDE study was funded by a federal
appropriation. The RAC and county commission hopes to pool together
resources from many stakeholders in order to make a study in the
Cabinet-Yaak feasible.
“I feel like in the NCDE we were
managing blind, putting all sorts of restrictions on land and
spending all kinds of money and we had no way to measure whether
what we were doing was any good at all for grizzly recovery,”
Kendall explained. “It sounds like a whole lot of money and it is a
lot of money, but when you put it in the context of everything else
it impacts .…”
Her study indicated that 765 grizzly
bears roamed the NCDE in 2004. That is 2-1/2 times more than the
agencies’ minimum estimate, Kendall said.
“Most of the agency people felt like
that was a real minimal number, that that was way low, but nobody
knew how low it was,” she said.
Kendall is now in the process of
replicating the study to determine the trend of the grizzly bear
population since 2004.
Government management agencies
respected the study as a reliable piece of data, Kendall said. In
taking unprecedented precautions for this type of study and
employing outside experts to weigh in on her methods, the study
came out with a surprisingly low margin of error of only 3.8
percent.
Kendall said she is part of a team that
is planning for the management of grizzly bears after the
population in the NCDE is taken off of the endangered species list.
The proposal to delist, Kendall said, stemmed from her population
study as well as from a Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks radio
collar study that estimates that the NCDE grizzly population is
increasing in the area at 3 percent per year.
Kendall explained at last week’s
presentation how she conducted the NCDE study and how a study in
the Cabinet-Yaak would need to be modified. The main difference,
she said, is size. The NCDE is geographically more than 3-1/2 times
larger than the Cabinet-Yaak. The smaller the population of bears,
she said, the tougher it is to get an accurate count.
Kendall’s team divided the NCDE into
7-by-7-kilometer grids and gathered samples in each grid by setting
up hair traps – a string of barbed wire hanging between two posts –
and identifying tree rubs where bears naturally discard hair. Field
crews gathered hair samples in each grid on four occasions at
14-day intervals.
For better accuracy, Kendall suggested
making smaller 5-by-5-kilometer grids in the Cabinet-Yaak and
increasing the number of hair-gathering sessions to five.
With each re-sample, teams pick up hair
from a few more bears, which aids in precision, as well as in
statistical modeling to determine the total population based on the
number of bears discovered.
The NCDE grizzly study took 2-1/2
years, Kendall said, the bulk of which was dedicated to the genetic
analysis of thousands of samples, which reveal species and sex of
the bears.
Knowing the genetic make-up of each of
the grizzlies and where they were located provides a wealth of
other information, she said, including whether bear populations are
fragmented and along what lines.
Kendall said she is helping agencies in
Alberta design the same grizzly project in the southern half of the
province for next summer.
It takes a lot of work and a group
effort, she explained.
“You cannot pull off a project like
this without all of the agency partners, private partners,
nonprofits, so it’s truly been a collaboration,” she said.
Kendall will give a presentation in
Libby again at a RAC meeting on Wednesday, Feb. 15 at 6 p.m. in the
Forest Supervisor’s Office.