Letter: What is rush on lakeshore regs?
Dear Editor:
Earlier this year our Lincoln County
commissioners appointed a committee to review the 1976 Lakeshore
Regulations and make recommendations. A series of four publicly
attended meetings were held, of which the public attending was
overwhelmingly against any sweeping changes.
In the end, the committee members made
minor changes and were in agreement with the public by voting 9-0
against major changes. They submitted their recommendations and
were generally ignored.
Aren’t our county commissioners elected
to represent the will of the people who elected them? Then why on
Dec. 8 are the Lincoln county commissioners planning to adopt
extensive changes and additions to the existing 1976
regulations?
Apparently, the commissioners and the
planning department have decided that it does not matter what the
public wants or what their committee has unanimously recommended
and have proposed a new draft of approximately 20 pages in
length.
They want something with “more teeth”
in it. Their latest proposal is a cookie cutter set of regulations
adopted in other agencies elsewhere.
At one of the meetings, I asked the
planning director, “Do you have any statistics to support your
changes?” The answer was “no.” It seems to me that there are always
a few “troublemakers” in any group of individuals – so why then
enforce major changes and regulations on the 95 percent of property
owners who care for their lakes and their environment, when it’s
the 5 percent who need to be corrected?
Who is the true beneficiary of this?
Surely, it is not the property owners.
The public has agreed that some changes
should be made. There is no argument with that. However, to what
degree is the issue. They have asked for public input and that is
good but due to the high degree of protest, more time is needed in
my opinion.
I believe that the commissioners should
hold off on making their decisions until next spring or early
summer when more lakeshore owners are back to give their input or
until there can be more public hearings on the matter.
What is the rush?
Sharon Johnson
Troy